Why are soft techniques such as grabs/holds preferred over hard techniques in self-defense?

Soft techniques such as grabs and holds are preferred in self-defense primarily because they cause less injury compared to hard techniques. These techniques focus on control and restraint rather than incapacitation, minimizing the likelihood of serious harm to both the defender and the aggressor. This approach not only aligns with the principles of using force as a last resort but also enhances the overall safety of the encounter.

Using softer techniques allows security personnel to de-escalate situations without escalating violence. The emphasis is often on redirecting or controlling the individual's movement rather than using excessive force that could lead to injuries. This method is particularly important in settings where the goal is to maintain safety without legal repercussions or unnecessary harm.

The other options do not capture the essence of why soft techniques are favored. While they may imply certain aspects about softness or liability, the primary concern and advantage lie in the reduction of injury, validating the choice related to the safety and well-being of all parties involved.